The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-1330•Patricia Yarbrough v. City of Norfolk
01-1330Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 23, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1330
PATRICIA YARBROUGH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CITY OF NORFOLK,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
(CA-00-358-2)
Submitted: May 17, 2001 Decided: May 23, 2001
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patricia Yarbrough, Appellant Pro Se. M. Wayne Ringer, CITY ATTOR-
NEY’S OFFICE, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Patricia Yarbrough appeals the district court’s judgment
granting summary judgment to the City of Norfolk and dismissing her
employment discrimination complaint alleging claims of sexual
harassment, hostile work environment and retaliation for having
engaged in protected conduct. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Yarbrough v.
City of Norfolk, No. CA-00-358-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 8, 2001). We dis-
pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.