Joseph D. Wassil v. JAMES F. SCHNEIDER, Judge, individually

01-1325Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 8, 2001

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1325
JOSEPH D. WASSIL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JAMES F. SCHNEIDER, Judge, individually and in
his official capacity; ELLEN M. HELLER, Judge,
individually and in her official capacity; B.
GEORGE BALLMAN, Trustee; JOEL P. GOLDBERGER,
Trustee; GLORIA ALLENDER, Commissioner; JIMMIE
L. FOXWORTH, Commissioner; FRANK M. CONAWAY,
Clerk; JAMES PIPER, Realtor; P. WESLEY FOSTER,
JR., Realtor; WESLEY P. HAIRSTON, Realtor; BOB
THOMAS, Defendant Piper’s Agent; NICHOLAS J.
DELPIZZO, III, Attorney,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-01-
338-L)
Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 8, 2001
Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph D. Wassil, Appellant Pro Se.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Joseph D. Wassil appeals from the district court’s order deny-
ing his petition for a writ of mandamus. Our review of the record
and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Wassil v. Schneider, No. CA-01-338-L (D. Md. Feb. 12, 2001). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.