Arthur O. Armstrong v. United States District Court

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1306
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 01-1307
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM L. OSTEEN,
Defendant - Appellee.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
No. 01-1310
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM L. OSTEEN; HERBERT J. HUTTON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District
Judge. (MISC-01-10-1, MISC-01-12-1, MISC-01-11-1)
Submitted: May 24, 2001 Decided: June 6, 2001
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur O. Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Arthur O. Armstrong appeals a
district court order denying his motions for leave to file com-
plaints. We have reviewed the record and the district court order
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Armstrong’s
motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and for summary
judgment and dismiss the appeals as frivolous. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the material before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --