Arthur O. Armstrong v. Koury Corporation

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1294
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KOURY CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 01-1574
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KOURY CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CA-97-1028-1)
Submitted: July 24, 2001 Decided: August 8, 2001

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur O. Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan A. Berkelhammer,
Laura Deddish Burton, SMITH, HELMS, MULLISS & MOORE, L.L.P.,
Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Arthur O. Armstrong appeals
district court orders amending an injunction and denying his motion
for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. We have reviewed
the record and the district court orders and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny the motions for leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and for summary judgment and dismiss the appeals as
frivolous. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --