Unum Life Insurance Company of America v. Robert Weinfeld, M.d

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1276
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA;
NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF VERMONT,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
and
LESLIE ANNE ROBERTS SULLIVAN,
Plaintiff,
versus
ROBERT WEINFELD, M.D.,
Defendant - Appellant,
PROVIDENT LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
BONNIE JEAN EDWARDS, formerly known as Bonnie
Jean Weinfeld; BRODSKY, GREENBLATT & RENEHAN,
CHARTERED; GINS AND GREENFELD, P.C.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
99-1030-PJM)
Submitted: September 6, 2001 Decided: September 11, 2001

-- 1 of 2 --

* Judge Williams did not participate in consideration of this
case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 46(d).
2
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, * and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Weinfeld, Appellant Pro Se. John Snowden Stanley, Jr.,
SEMMES, BOWEN & SEMMES, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Robert Weinfeld appeals from the district court’s order dis-
missing as moot his motion for clarification of payment. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Unum Life Ins. Co. of America v. Weinfeld, No.
CA-99-1030-PJM (D. Md. Feb. 9, 2001). We dispense with oral argu-
ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre-
sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --