The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-1197•Nikolay Palov v. Ikon Office Solutions, Incorporated
01-1197Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 7, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1197
NIKOLAY PALOV,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-
99-1650-DKC)
Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: June 7, 2001
Before WILKINS and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nikolay Palov, Appellant Pro Se. Gil A. Abramson, HOGAN & HARTSON,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nikolay Palov appeals the district court’s grant of summary
judgment to IKON Office Solutions on his claim of employment dis-
crimination based on national origin and disability. We have re-
viewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Palov v. IKON Office Solutions, Inc., No. CA-99-
1650-DKC (D. Md. Jan. 4, 2001). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.