The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-1155•Keith A. Batten v. International Refrigerated Port Services
01-1155Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 18, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1155
KEITH A. BATTEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
INTERNATIONAL REFRIGERATED PORT SERVICES,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
Judge. (CA-00-499)
Submitted: April 12, 2001 Decided: April 18, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith A. Batten, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin D. Holden, SPOTTS, FAIN,
BUIS, CHAPPELL & ANDERSON, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Keith A. Batten appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to Defendant in his Title VII suit for wrongful
discrimination. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Batten v. In-
ternational Refrigerated Port Servs., No. CA-00-499 (E.D. Va. Jan.
17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.