Thomas, Lord of Shalford v. SHELLEY’S JEWELRY, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Shelley’s Auction Gallery

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1077
THOMAS, LORD OF SHALFORD; LINDA, LADY OF
SHALFORD, his wife,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
SHELLEY’S JEWELRY, INCORPORATED, d/b/a
Shelley’s Auction Gallery; JOETTE M. HUMPHREY;
JOHN F. LAUGHTER; BILLY R. RAMSEY; KEITH G.
SHELLEY; STANLEY R. SHELLEY,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
JEWELERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District
Judge. (CA-99-162-1)
Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: September 10, 2001
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Thomas, Lord of Shalford, Linda, Lady of Shalford, Appellants Pro
Se. Frank J. Contrivo, Andrew James Santaniello, FRANK J. CONTRIVO,
P.A., Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Thomas, Lord of Shalford, and Linda, Lady of Shalford, appeal
the district court’s order granting summary judgment in this diver-
sity action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. Lord of Shalford v. Shelley’s
Jewelry, Inc., No. CA-99-162-1 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 2000). We dis-
pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --