The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
01-1051•Mary Ann Smith v. LARRY G. MASSANARI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
01-1051Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 29, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1051
MARY ANN SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LARRY G. MASSANARI, Acting Commissioner of
Social Security Administration,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Magistrate Judge.
(CA-00-77-7)
Submitted: June 12, 2001 Decided: June 29, 2001
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles D. Bennett, Jr., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. James
A. Winn, Regional Chief Counsel, Thomas C. Buchanan, Supervisory
Regional Counsel, Robert W. Flynn, Assistant Regional Counsel,
Office of General Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Robert P. Crouch, Jr., United States
Attorney, Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney,
Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate
judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c) (West 1993 & Supp. 2000).
2
PER CURIAM:
Mary Ann Smith appeals the magistrate judge’s order upholding
the administrative law judge’s denial of Social Security disability
benefits.* We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Smith v. Massanari, No. CA-
00-77-7 (W.D. Va. Oct. 31, 2000). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.