The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-7808•United States of America v. Joyce Torian Thompson
00-7808Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 19, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7808
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JOYCE TORIAN THOMPSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (CR-87-53)
Submitted: February 28, 2001 Decided: March 19, 2001
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joyce Torian Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Janice McKenzie Cole,
United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joyce Torian Thompson appeals the district court’s denial of
her motion to correct an illegal sentence, and motion to amend that
motion. Our review of the record and the district court’s ruling
discloses that this appeal from the district court’s order denying
her motions is without merit. United States v. Thompson, No. CR-
87-53 (E.D.N.C. filed Oct. 24, 2000; entered Oct. 30, 2000).
Therefore, we affirm the district court’s ruling. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.