The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-7800•Kevin Duty, a/k/a Keith Duty v. B. B. GENTRY, Lieutenant of the Jail
00-7800Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 16, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7800
KEVIN DUTY, a/k/a Keith Duty,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
B. B. GENTRY, Lieutenant of the Jail; SERGEANT
PRICE, Sergeant of the Jail; MS. GARRIT, Nurse
of the Jail,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.
(CA-00-643-2)
Submitted: February 8, 2001 Decided: February 16, 2001
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Duty, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kevin Duty appeals the district court’s order dismissing his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint without prejudice
for failure to pay the filing fee or return the consent to payment
forms required under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that
this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on
the reasoning of the district court. Duty v. Gentry, No. CA-00-
643-2 (E.D. Va. Dec. 11, 2000). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.