Curtis Wayne Monroe, a/k/a Curtis Wayne Monroe-Bey v. Ronald Hutchinson

00-7723Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 20, 2001

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7723
CURTIS WAYNE MONROE, a/k/a Curtis Wayne
Monroe-Bey,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
RONALD HUTCHINSON; JOHN JOSEPH CURRAN, JR.,
the Attorney General of the State of Maryland,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.
(CA-99-2792-WMN)
Submitted: April 10, 2001 Decided: April 20, 2001
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curtis Wayne Monroe, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Ann Norman Bossse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Curtis Wayne Monroe appeals the district court’s order dis-
missing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &
Supp. 2000) as time-barred under the Antiterrorism and Effective
Death Penalty Act (AEDPA). We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. See
Hernandez v. Caldwell, 225 F.3d 435 (4th Cir. 2000). Further, we
conclude Monroe is not entitled to equitable tolling of the AEDPA’s
one-year limitations period. See Harris v. Hutchinson, 209 F.3d
325 (4th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-
pealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.