The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-7713•John Henry Johnson v. JOSEPH M. BROOKS, Warden
00-7713Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 17, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7713
JOHN HENRY JOHNSON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JOSEPH M. BROOKS, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CA-00-777)
Submitted: April 12, 2001 Decided: April 17, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Henry Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John Johnson appeals the district court’s orders denying re-
lief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition and denying his motion
for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we af-
firm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Brooks,
No. CA-00-777 (E.D. Va. Nov. 22 & Dec. 22, 2000). We grant leave
to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.