The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-7690•Jerry Locklear v. James D. Engleman
00-7690Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 23, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7690
JERRY LOCKLEAR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JAMES D. ENGLEMAN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-00-616-BO)
Submitted: May 10, 2001 Decided: May 23, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry Locklear, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jerry Locklear, a North Carolina inmate, appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.
2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000). We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal
on the reasoning of the district court. See Locklear v. Engleman,
No. CA-00-616-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 25, 2000). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.