The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-7683•Larkie Lynch v. Johnny H. Williams
00-7683Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 15, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7683
LARKIE LYNCH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHNNY H. WILLIAMS; JOYCE WILLIAMS; RICHARD E.
HUNTER, JR.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District
Judge. (CA-00-549-5-F)
Submitted: February 6, 2001 Decided: February 15, 2001
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larkie Lynch, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Larkie Lynch appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and the district’s opinion and find no revers-
ible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the dis-
trict court. Lynch v. Williams, No. CA-00-549-5-F (E.D.N.C. Oct.
20, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.