Joseph J. Ritch v. Georgia Perdue, R.n

00-7657Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 16, 2001

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7657
JOSEPH J. RITCH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GEORGIA PERDUE, R.N.; RAZAAK ENIOLA, Dr.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-00-
880-MJG)
Submitted: March 8, 2001 Decided: March 16, 2001
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph J. Ritch, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Melton Andrews, Michael
Joseph Lentz, KRAMON & GRAHAM, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph J. Ritch appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Ritch v. Perdue, No. CA-00-880-MJG (D. Md. Oct. 31,
2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.