The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-7657•Joseph J. Ritch v. Georgia Perdue, R.n
00-7657Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 16, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7657
JOSEPH J. RITCH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GEORGIA PERDUE, R.N.; RAZAAK ENIOLA, Dr.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-00-
880-MJG)
Submitted: March 8, 2001 Decided: March 16, 2001
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph J. Ritch, Appellant Pro Se. Philip Melton Andrews, Michael
Joseph Lentz, KRAMON & GRAHAM, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph J. Ritch appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Ritch v. Perdue, No. CA-00-880-MJG (D. Md. Oct. 31,
2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.