United States of America v. Guy Carmichael Crenshaw

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7653
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GUY CARMICHAEL CRENSHAW,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James H. Michael, Jr., Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-96-47)
Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 3, 2001
Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir-
cuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Guy Carmichael Crenshaw, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Guy Carmichael Crenshaw appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion for modification of sentence, 18
U.S.C. § 3582 (1994). Our review of the record and the district
court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
Crenshaw, No. CR-96-47 (W.D. Va. Nov. 13, 2000). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --