The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-7634•Mark David Swann v. WILLIAM W. SONDERVAN, Commissioner of Cor- rections
00-7634Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 20, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7634
MARK DAVID SWANN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM W. SONDERVAN, Commissioner of Cor-
rections; ROBERT KUPEC, Warden, Eastern Cor-
rectional Institution; GEORGE KALOROUMAKIS;
RONALD DRYDEN; CAPTAIN FLAG; LIEUTENANT
MATTHEWS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-00-
1705)
Submitted: February 9, 2001 Decided: February 20, 2001
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark David Swann, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., At-
torney General, Sharon Stanley Street, Assistant Attorney General,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mark David Swann appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district’s opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Swann v. Sondervan, No. CA-00-1705 (D. Md. Nov. 3,
2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.