The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-7613•Charlie Mack Williams, Sr v. DAVID R. TANIS, Attorney
00-7613Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 19, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7613
CHARLIE MACK WILLIAMS, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DAVID R. TANIS, Attorney,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CA-00-783)
Submitted: January 11, 2001 Decided: January 19, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charlie Mack Williams, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Charlie Mack Williams, Sr., a North Carolina inmate, appeals
the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1998). We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting
the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find that this appeal is
frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of
the district court. Williams v. Tannis, No. CA-00-783 (M.D.N.C.
filed Oct. 19, 2000; entered Oct. 20, 2000). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.