The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-7562•United States of America v. James Edward Smith, a/k/a Smitty, a/k/a Dump- truck Smitty
00-7562Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 19, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7562
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JAMES EDWARD SMITH, a/k/a Smitty, a/k/a Dump-
truck Smitty,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CR-90-71, CA-00-696-3)
Submitted: January 19, 2001 Decided: April 19, 2001
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Edward Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Elizabeth Flannery,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Edward Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion that it construed as filed under 28 U.S.C.A.
§ 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on
the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Smith, Nos.
CR-90-71; CA-00-696-3 (E.D. Va. Oct. 19, 2000). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.