The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-7554•Kevin Jerome Fuell v. United States of America
00-7554Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 22, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7554
KEVIN JEROME FUELL,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; D. SCOTT DODRILL,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-00-592-5-BO)
Submitted: December 14, 2000 Decided: December 22, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Jerome Fuell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kevin Jerome Fuell seeks to appeal the district court’s orders
denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994),
and denying his motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have re-
viewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Fuell v. United States, No. CA-00-592-5-BO
(E.D.N.C. Sept. 20 & Oct. 12, 2000). We dispense with oral argu-
ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.