The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-7457•United States of America v. Arnold Threet
00-7457Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 18, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7457
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ARNOLD THREET,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CR-98-
59-L, CA-00-2493-L)
Submitted: January 5, 2001 Decided: January 18, 2001
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arnold Threet, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States
Attorney, Bonnie S. Greenberg, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTOR-
NEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Arnold Threet seeks to appeal the district court’s order de-
nying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis-
trict court. United States v. Threet, Nos. CR-98-59-L; CA-00-2493-
L (D. Md. filed Aug. 28, 2000; entered Aug. 29, 2000). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.