The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-7412•United States of America v. Antoine Baptiste
00-7412Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 11, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7412
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ANTOINE BAPTISTE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Salisbury. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CR-97-114, CA-99-498-1)
Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 11, 2000
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antoine Baptiste, Appellant Pro Se. Clifton Thomas Barrett, As-
sistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Antoine Baptiste seeks to appeal the district court’s orders
denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000)
and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Baptiste,
Nos. CR-97-114; CA-99-498-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 10 & Sept. 14, 2000).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.