(CR-90-74-A, CA-97-791-AM) United States of America v. Henry Saunders

Filed: April 23, 2001
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7396
(CR-90-74-A, CA-97-791-AM)
United States of America,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
Henry Saunders,
Defendant - Appellant.
O R D E R
The court amends its opinion filed April 16, 2001, as follows:
On the cover sheet, section 3, line 3; and on page 2, line 7
of text -- the first district court number is corrected to read
“CR-90-74-A.”
For the Court - By Direction
/s/ Patricia S. Connor
Clerk

-- 1 of 3 --

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7396
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
HENRY SAUNDERS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.
(CR-90-74-A, CA-97-791-AM)
Submitted: March 23, 2001 Decided: April 16, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Henry Saunders, Appellant Pro Se. William Neil Hammerstrom, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Henry Saunders seeks to appeal the district court’s orders
denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999)
and his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to reconsider. We have re-
viewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-
ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Saunders, Nos. CR-90-74-A; CA-97-791-AM
(E.D. Va. June 5 and Aug. 2, 2000). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --