The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-7386•Wallace Mitchell-El v. Yvonne Elswick
00-7386Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 28, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7386
WALLACE MITCHELL-EL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
YVONNE ELSWICK; GEORGE E. DEEDS; J. ARMEN-
TROUT, Assistant Warden Operations; RED ONION
STATE PRISON; EDWARD C. MORRIS, Deputy Direc-
tor; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CA-00-83-7)
Submitted: November 14, 2000 Decided: February 28, 2001
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wallace Mitchell-El, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Wallace Mitchell-El appeals a district court order denying his
motion for leave to file an amended complaint. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm essentially on the reasoning of the
district court. See Mitchell-El v. Elswick, No. CA-00-83-7 (W.D.
Va. Sept. 5, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.