The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-7374•Dwayne Mahdi v. Officer Lawhorn
00-7374Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 16, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7374
DWAYNE MAHDI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
OFFICER LAWHORN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District
Judge. (CA-00-587)
Submitted: November 9, 2000 Decided: November 16, 2000
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dwayne Mahdi, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dwayne Mahdi, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000)
complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000). We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that
this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on
the reasoning of the district court. See Mahdi v. Lawhorn, No. CA-
00-587 (W.D. Va. Aug. 31, 2000). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.