The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-7329•Jasper Napoleon Buchanan v. William D. Catoe
00-7329Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 14, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7329
JASPER NAPOLEON BUCHANAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM D. CATOE; RICKIE HARRISON; BONNIE
BURELLE BROWN; K. WHITE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District
Judge. (CA-99-3185-08BD)
Submitted: February 8, 2001 Decided: February 14, 2001
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jasper Napoleon Buchanan, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Eric Petersen,
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jasper Napoleon Buchanan appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) com-
plaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Buchanan v. Catoe, No. CA-99-3185-08BD (D.S.C.
Aug. 18, 2000). We deny Buchanan’s motion to proceed under the
Prison Litigation Reform Act and we dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.