The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-7258•United States of America v. Maurice Gregory
00-7258Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 28, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7258
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MAURICE GREGORY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CR-92-163-N, CA-00-78)
Submitted: November 28, 2000 Decided: December 28, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William P. Robinson, Jr., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Laura
Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Vir-
ginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Maurice Gregory appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.
1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif-
icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of
the district court. See United States v. Gregory, Nos. CR-92-163-
N; CA-00-78 (E.D. Va., filed June 19, 2000; entered June 25, 2000).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.