Keith Lamonte Hill v. LINDA CURTIS, Commonwealth Attorney

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7256
KEITH LAMONTE HILL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LINDA CURTIS, Commonwealth Attorney;
CHRISTOPHER HUTTON; B. J. ROBERTS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.
(CA-99-817)
Submitted: January 19, 2001 Decided: February 7, 2001
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith Lamonte Hill, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Keith Lamonte Hill appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. Hill v. Curtis, No. CA-99-817 (E.D. Va. Aug.
24, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --