The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-7245•Randal N. Wiideman v. ROBERT A. WATSON, Commissioner, individually, officially
00-7245Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 15, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7245
RANDAL N. WIIDEMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROBERT A. WATSON, Commissioner, individually,
officially and in conspiracy with State
Agents; STEPHEN MANUEL ARNOLD, Pastor, indi-
vidually, officially and in conspiracy with
State Agents,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge.
(CA-00-891-AM)
Submitted: November 9, 2000 Decided: November 15, 2000
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randal N. Wiideman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Randal N. Wiideman, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.
2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000). We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal
on the reasoning of the district court. See Wiideman v. Watson,
No. CA-00-891-AM (E.D. Va. filed June 27; entered June 28, 2000).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.