The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-7235•United States of America v. Mathew Archie, a/k/a Matthew Archie
00-7235Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 30, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7235
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MATHEW ARCHIE, a/k/a Matthew Archie,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-98-1184)
Submitted: March 23, 2001 Decided: March 30, 2001
Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mathew Archie, Appellant Pro Se. Harold Watson Gowdy, III, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mathew Archie appeals the district court’s orders denying his
motions for release of documents related to his criminal convic-
tion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. United States v. Archie, No. CR-
98-1184 (D.S.C. Aug. 2, 2000; filed July 17, 2000; entered July 18,
2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.