The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-7217•United States of America v. Ricky Lee Vance
00-7217Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 11, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7217
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RICKY LEE VANCE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Abingdon. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CR-94-22)
Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 11, 2000
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ricky Lee Vance, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Randall Ramseyer, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ricky Lee Vance appeals the district court’s order denying his
motions for production of documents and his motion for the district
judge to recuse himself. We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States
v. Vance, No. CR-94-22 (W.D. Va. June 19, 2000). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.