The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-7195•Ricardo Evans v. RONALD ANGELONE, Director, Department of Cor- rection, State of Virginia
00-7195Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 22, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7195
RICARDO EVANS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
RONALD ANGELONE, Director, Department of Cor-
rection, State of Virginia,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-00-3-A)
Submitted: January 31, 2001 Decided: February 22, 2001
Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ricardo Evans, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ricardo Evans seeks to appeal the district court’s order de-
nying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West
1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
Evans’ motions to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and for
appointment of counsel, deny a certificate of appealability, and
dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See
Evans v. Angelone, No. CA-00-3-A (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 3, 2000;
entered Apr. 5, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.