The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-7171•Craig Allan Black v. RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Department of Corrections, Virginia
00-7171Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 20, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7171
CRAIG ALLAN BLACK,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Department of
Corrections, Virginia,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Tommy E. Miller, Magistrate Judge.
(CA-00-27-2)
Submitted: December 14, 2000 Decided: December 20, 2000
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Craig Allan Black, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew P. Dullaghan, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Craig Allan Black appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying
relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &
Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the magistrate
judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially
on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Black v. Angelone,
No. CA-00-27-2 (E.D. Va. July 28, 2000). We deny Black’s motion to
supplement the record. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.