Charles Michael Mitchell v. Chief Austin

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7169
CHARLES MICHAEL MITCHELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CHIEF AUSTIN; PAUL MEAD, and all other con-
cerned parties of the Columbia City Police
Department,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Patrick Michael Duffy, District
Judge. (CA-99-1620-0-23BD)
Submitted: February 6, 2001 Decided: February 20, 2001
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Michael Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Gordon Cooper,
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

* Appellees are Charles Austin, Chief of Police for the City
of Columbia, South Carolina, and Paul Mead, an investigator with
the Columbia City Police Department.
2
PER CURIAM:
Charles Michael Mitchell appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) com-
plaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion agreeing with the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant
summary judgment to the Appellees * and find no error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mitchell v.
Austin, No. CA-99-1620-0-23BD (D.S.C. Aug. 2, 2000). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --