United States of America v. Charles Tyrone Peeler

00-7130Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 15, 2000

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7130
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CHARLES TYRONE PEELER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge; Herbert
N. Maletz, Senior Judge, sitting by designation. (CR-96-379-PJM,
CA-99-3646-HNM)
Submitted: November 9, 2000 Decided: November 15, 2000
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Tyrone Peeler, Appellant Pro Se. Ranganath Manthripragada,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Charles Tyrone Peeler appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West
1994 & Supp. 2000), and denying his subsequent motions for tran-
scripts and discovery materials. We have reviewed the record and
the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Ac-
cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
United States v. Peeler, Nos. CR-96-379-PJM; CA-99-3646-HNM (D. Md.
May 8 & July 6, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.