Larry Bodie v. Ronald J. Angelone

00-7117Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 15, 2000

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7117
LARRY BODIE,
Plaintiff- Appellant,
versus
RONALD J. ANGELONE; DR. CEI; K. B. HUBBARD; J.
S. KEELING; A. M. POWERS; R. R. ROBINSON; P.
K. MELVIN; J. S. GARMAN; J. L. FRANKLIN; J. E.
WHITE; K. L. OSBORNE; H. S. RICHESON; C. F.
SPARKS; P. A. TERRANGI; R. FLEMMING; L. A.
CORNERS; MS. PORCHER; J. PETTY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-99-810-3)
Submitted: November 9, 2000 Decided: November 15, 2000
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Bodie, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Larry Bodie, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000)
complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(a) (West Supp. 2000). We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the
magistrate judge’s recommendation and find that this appeal is
frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of
the district court. See Bodie v. Angelone, No. CA-99-810-3 (E.D.
Va. July 27, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.