The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-7109•In re: Michael Wayne Montgomery, a/k/a Shaka Macumba Zulu Z
00-7109Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 17, 2001
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7109
In re: MICHAEL WAYNE MONTGOMERY, a/k/a Shaka
Macumba Zulu Z,
Plaintiff - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (MISC-95-136-6)
Submitted: January 11, 2001 Decided: January 17, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Wayne Montgomery, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Wayne Montgomery appeals the district court’s order
denying his petition for relief from a properly imposed prefiling
injunction. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. In re: Montgomery, No. MISC-
95-136-6 (D.S.C. July 26, 2000). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.