Sally E. Claybrooks v. JIM NEWSOME, Safety Inspector

00-7097Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 18, 2001

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7097
SALLY E. CLAYBROOKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JIM NEWSOME, Safety Inspector; MARY CLARKE,
Doctor VCCW; BOBBI HENDERSON, Nurse,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-00-1097-AM)
Submitted: September 10, 2001 Decided: September 18, 2001
Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sally E. Claybrooks, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Sally E. Claybrooks appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on her 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. Claybrooks v. Newsome, No. CA-00-1097-AM (E.D.
Va. July 21, 2000); see Booth v. Churner, 531 U.S. 956 (2001). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.