The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-7057•United States of America v. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. CR-91-429-A
00-7057Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 16, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7057
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MARLON BRAMWELL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CR-91-429-A)
Submitted: October 31, 2000 Decided: November 16, 2000
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marlon Bramwell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Marlon Bramwell appeals the district court’s order denying his
motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny Bramwell’s pending motion filed under
Fed. R. App. P. 10(a) and affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See United States v. Bramwell, No. CR-91-429-A (E.D. Va.
May 23, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.