The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-7004•Alexander Cameron v. S. SARRAF, Doctor
00-7004Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 2, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-7004
ALEXANDER CAMERON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
S. SARRAF, Doctor; DOCTOR SWETTER, Medical
Director,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
D. HOWELL, LPN/Nurse; M. INMAN, R/N, Head
Nurse; X-RAY EXAMINERS; SIDHU BALJIT, Doctor,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior Dis-
trict Judge. (CA-98-1227-AM)
Submitted: October 26, 2000 Decided: November 2, 2000
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alexander Cameron, Appellant Pro Se. David Ernest Boelzner, WRIGHT,
ROBINSON, OSTHIMER & TATUM, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Alexander Cameron appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment in favor of the Appellees on his 42 U.S.C.A.
§ 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Cameron v. Sarraf, No. CA-98-1227-AM (E.D. Va. filed June 12, 2000;
entered June 13, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.