United States of America v. Stacy Cole Justice, a/k/a Stacey Cole Justice

00-6969Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 24, 2001

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6969
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
STACY COLE JUSTICE, a/k/a Stacey Cole Justice,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge.
(CR-96-1020)
Submitted: January 18, 2001 Decided: January 24, 2001
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stacy Cole Justice, Appellant Pro Se. E. Jean Howard, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Stacy Cole Justice appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion to inspect grand jury minutes. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. United States v. Justice, No. CR-96-1020 (D.S.C. May 18,
2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.