Floyd Raymond Looker, Jr v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 1949 . The

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6924
FLOYD RAYMOND LOOKER, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DAVID E. GODWIN, Esq.; J. C. RAFFETY, SRSA;
OTHER UNKNOWN FEDERAL OFFICIALS,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
OKEI MARSHALL RICHARDS, JR.; WILLIAM CIPRIANI,
Esq.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern Dis-
trict of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Chief
District Judge. (CA-99-111-5)
Submitted: February 8, 2001 Decided: February 13, 2001
Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Floyd Raymond Looker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell
Altmeyer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West
Virginia, for Appellees.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Floyd Raymond Looker, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
dismissing Defendants Godwin, Raffety, and “other unknown federal
officials” and denying Looker’s motion for change of venue. We
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is
not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over
final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).
The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --