The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-6908•United States of America v. Reinaldo Lozano, a/k/a Ray
00-6908Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 11, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6908
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
REINALDO LOZANO, a/k/a Ray,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-86-35-NN)
Submitted: August 30, 2000 Decided: September 11, 2000
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reinaldo Lozano, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Anthony Exley, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Reinaldo Lozano appeals the district court’s order denying his
motion to reconsider the denial of his motion to correct his sen-
tence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-
ion and order and find no reversible error. See United States v.
Williams, 674 F.2d 310, 312 (4th Cir. 1982). Accordingly, we grant
Lozano leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and affirm the district
court’s denial of his motion to reconsider. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.