The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-6907•United States of America v. Christopher Polycarp Tizhe, a/k/a Muyiwa Tizhe, a/k/a Chris Olorade
00-6907Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 11, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6907
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CHRISTOPHER POLYCARP TIZHE, a/k/a Muyiwa
Tizhe, a/k/a Chris Olorade,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CR-
96-177-CCB, CA-99-1790-CCB)
Submitted: August 30, 2000 Decided: September 11, 2000
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Polycarp Tizhe, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Reeves
Harding, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Polycarp Tizhe seeks to appeal the district
court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255
(West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Tizhe, Nos.
CR-96-177-CCB; CA-99-1790-CCB (D. Md. Apr. 28, 2000). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.