The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-6828•Colon Alston, Jr v. Tillery Correctional Institution
00-6828Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 8, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6828
COLON ALSTON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TILLERY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; JOHN R.
WILLIAMS; MR. GAYLOR; MRS. BROWN; MR. BABB,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District
Judge. (CA-00-162-5-BR)
Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 8, 2000
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Colon Alston, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Colon Alston, Jr., a North Carolina inmate, appeals the dis-
trict court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West
Supp. 2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000).
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Alston v.
Tillery Corr. Inst., No. CA-00-162-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 20, 2000).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.