The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
00-6810•George Adams v. John Middleton, Incorporated
00-6810Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 8, 2000
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6810
GEORGE ADAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
WILBERT GALLMAN,
Plaintiff,
versus
JOHN MIDDLETON, INCORPORATED; TOP REPUBLIC
TOBACCO; BRIAN J. DIEHL, President-Director of
South Carolina Department of Corrections
canteen,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-99-2717-3-18BC)
Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 8, 2000
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
George Adams, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Woodrow Hogue, NELSON,
MULLINS, RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, Columbia, South Carolina; Thomas
Frank Dougall, BOWERS, ORR & DOUGALL, Columbia, South Carolina;
Terry B. Millar, Rock Hill, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
George Adams appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the
magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Adams v. John Middleton, Inc., No. CA-99-2717-3-18BC (D.S.C. May
18, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.