In re: Aaron McKinney, Sr.

00-6733Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 12, 2000

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6733
In re: AARON MCKINNEY, SR.,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-98-557-1)
Submitted: June 27, 2000 Decided: July 12, 2000
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Aaron McKinney, Sr., Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Aaron McKinney, Sr., filed a petition for a writ of mandamus
alleging undue delay in the district court in resolving an issue we
remanded to the district court. The district court has since
answered the question. See McKinney v. Attorney Gen. of N.C., No.
CA-98-557-1 (M.D.N.C. June 5, 2000). Accordingly, we deny the man-
damus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.