United States of America v. McLean , No. CR-90-105 E.D. Va. Mar. 14, 2000 . We also deny McLean’s motions to…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6670
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CLEVELAND MCLEAN, JR., a/k/a Junior, a/k/a
June,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
Judge. (CR-80-105)
Submitted: January 16, 2001 Decided: January 31, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cleveland McLean, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Cleveland McLean, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his motion, which the court construed as a 28
U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000) motion. We have reviewed the
record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See
United States v. McLean , No. CR-90-105 (E.D. Va. Mar. 14, 2000).
We also deny McLean’s motions to vacate the district court’s order
and for attorney’s fees. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --