James E. Terry v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066 4th Cir. 1993 . However, since…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-6602
JAMES E. TERRY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROBERT AKERSON,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District
Judge. (CA-00-151)
Submitted: July 27, 2000 Decided: August 4, 2000
Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James E. Terry, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

* Generally, dismissals without prejudice are not appealable.
See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d
1064, 1066 (4th Cir. 1993). However, since amendment to Terry’s
complaint could not cure the defects the district court found in
his case, the district court’s dismissal is a final, appealable
order. See id. at 1066-67.
2
PER CURIAM:
James E. Terry appeals the district court’s order dismissing
without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) com-
plaint.* We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Terry v. Akerson, No. CA-
00-151 (W.D. Va. Apr. 11, 2000). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --